Anyone
who observes human activity soon comes to the conclusion that there is often no
constructive cooperation, despite all the intentions and incentives from
management. In
organizations, and on all other levels of human activity, that is a painful
reason for inefficiency. There is often opposition or a mild form of mutual tolerance between management and employees between leaders and others. Can this be avoided?
The
insights from the Transactional Analysis ( 1) (2) (3) can help us to gain insight into causes,
and especially solutions. The condition is that we give this model a contemporary interpretation.
Human
behavior is largely determined by learned behavioral patterns. Education is a breeding ground that gives
an inevitable impulse to both positive and negative patterns. In dealing with others, we have learned in
this way that there are three fundamentally different ways.
Subordination:
I am the lesser, so I have to adapt to the possibilities, try to survive, put
the burdens and responsibility on others, and find the most comfortable way of
life for myself. Berne called this "child behavior" because children develop it
in the first phase of their lives as a reaction to their helplessness and
dependence, but also as an adaptation to the (necessary) steering behavior of
their parents.
Upper
settlement: I place myself above the others, want to determine the situation
and therefore also determine other people according to my wishes, want to get
control, and so start steering. Berne called this “parenting behavior”,
because the child copied this way of acting from his parents.
Co-ordination:
I am equal with the others, and we seek together, based on agreements, how we
can live together, work together, achieve a goal. There is no use for power over each other,
no competition between people. Berne called this the "adult"
behavior.
There
are understandable reasons for a leader to confuse his role with parenting
behavior. However,
the consequences are disastrous. The well-known principle "behavior
provokes behavior" will ensure that unproductive reactions arise in
others: opposition (parent behavior evokes parent behavior), or survival behavior (parent behavior encourages child behavior). The interactions between these patterns of
behavior create a negative spiral in organizations, with more and more steering
leadership, and more and more opposition and dependence. This unproductive way of working
overshadows all other measures to develop productivity and motivation in
people.
A
good understanding of these mechanisms can form the basis for good cooperation,
both horizontally and vertically. The practical rules for avoiding these
disruptive relationship patterns should be included in the organizational
culture (see more on this on a different page) (4).
(1) E. Berne, Don't be annoyed, Bert Bakker, The Hague, 1964)
(2) Harris T., I'm OK, you're OK, Ambo,
Bilthoven, 1973
(3) Stewart I., Joines V., TA today. A new introduction to transactional
analysis, Russel Press, Nottingham, 1987
(4) My more extensive
description of the mechanism of Transactional Analysis, including advices dealing
with it, is available.
(5) The way to introduce explicit wanted
behavior in organizational cultures, is described in a separate contribution
Hugo Der
KInderen
No comments:
Post a Comment